Radiators Part 3 – Small and thick or slim and big?

May 4, 2017 | Guides | Atila Gobor
Share on social:

Time to continue the story about radiators for liquid cooling. We have covered the basics about radiators in the Part 1 blog, and in Part 2 we even showed some charts. Part 2 clarified things about radiator performance, how radiator performance is expressed and how do we read radiator performance charts. We have shown how two of the most popular radiator sizes (120 and 140mm), with different thickness variants, relate to one another performance-wise.

In this episode, Part 3, we are going to address a very important question. What is more important for better cooling? A small but thick radiator or a large but slim radiator? Some already know the answer to this question, but as we said many times before, our blogs are for „all ages“, so we are going to discuss this topic. Still, if you are an experienced liquid cooling user, and you already know the answer, maybe now you have a chance to see concrete results presented in some nice charts for the first time.

In the chart above, we can easily see how the slimmest SE 360 radiator beats the thickest XE 240 in every aspect. If you are after a silent liquid cooled build, and you have the option to mount a 360mm radiator, by all means, the SE 360 is the way to go.

Many presume that thick radiators are packed with super-powers and will bring extreme cooling performances, but things are more complicated than that. But why is it so? In previous radiator blog posts, we already talked about how radiators work. In a push configuration, cold air is pushed in by a fan from one side of the radiator and warm air leaves at the other side of the radiator. Heat is being transferred from the liquid to the radiator fins, and onto the air that is pushed through by the fan. By these simple steps, heat from a CPU or GPU is leaving your PC in a form of warm air.

Imagine that an XE 120 60mm thick radiator is actually three slim radiators packed on top of each other. As the fins are being cooled from bottom to top, the air that passes through the radiator is being warmed up. This means that when the air reaches the third and last radiator in the imaginary stack, it’s not cool enough to provide efficient cooling. If you remember from our Radiators Part 2 blog, the greater the difference between the coolant temperature and the ambient temperature, which is the temperature of the air passing through the radiator, the better cooling performance you will have.

So… by using a thick radiator, the bottom part of it, in this case, will have better cooling while the top is less efficient. Taking this „gradient“ into account, a thick radiator will have a worse performance with low fan speeds. The chart above shows that the XE 240 will catch up with the slim SE 360 only if we crank up the fan speeds.

Let us look at some extreme comparisons. If we compare the super thick single XE 120 with the slim triple SE 360, we will see how much advantage a bigger cooling surface has over a small thick radiator. Predictably, the PE 240 will sit in the middle of these two. Therefore, even though we can look at the XE 120 as a slim SE 360 that is chopped up and stacked in three layers, it is not even close to the slim triple radiator regarding performance.

So why would anyone choose a CoolStream XE 240 instead of an SE 360? It’s simple, because of space restrictions. Not many cases offer support for a 360mm radiator, which is the reason why the 240mm form factor is more widespread. Of course, if you can, it’s good to spread out and get two CoolStream SE 240 Slim radiators instead of grouping your cooling into one thick radiator. But it all comes down to the personal choice and case limitations. If while reading this you got the feeling that thick radiators, like the CoolStream XE, are useless, you will just have to wait for our next “Radiators” episode where we will discuss Push, Pull and Push&Pull setups. You will like the numbers you’re going to see there.

22 replies
  1. Yassar Javaid
    Yassar Javaid says:

    Very good blog post, very informative. So we know that a slimmer radiator that is long is better then a thicker radiator that is short but what if they’re both the same length, which one is better, a 360mm thin radiator or 360mm thick radiator?

    Same length, only difference is thickness.

    • Atila Gobor
      Atila Gobor says:

      The main message here is, if you want to run your fans at a lower speed, a big slim radiator or two smaller slim radiators will perform better than one thick. Thick radiators have more cooling power, but they require faster fans to exploit that performance.

Trackbacks & Pingbacks

  1. Huc99 says:

    … [Trackback]

    […] Find More to that Topic: ekwb.com/blog/radiators-part-3-surface-thickness/ […]

  2. … [Trackback]

    […] Find More on to that Topic: ekwb.com/blog/radiators-part-3-surface-thickness/ […]

  3. best cams says:

    … [Trackback]

    […] Read More on to that Topic: ekwb.com/blog/radiators-part-3-surface-thickness/ […]

  4. William says:

    … [Trackback]

    […] Read More to that Topic: ekwb.com/blog/radiators-part-3-surface-thickness/ […]

  5. … [Trackback]

    […] There you will find 79871 additional Information to that Topic: ekwb.com/blog/radiators-part-3-surface-thickness/ […]

  6. … [Trackback]

    […] Find More on on that Topic: ekwb.com/blog/radiators-part-3-surface-thickness/ […]

  7. … [Trackback]

    […] Find More to that Topic: ekwb.com/blog/radiators-part-3-surface-thickness/ […]

  8. … [Trackback]

    […] Read More Info here on that Topic: ekwb.com/blog/radiators-part-3-surface-thickness/ […]

  9. 789 club says:

    … [Trackback]

    […] Find More Info here to that Topic: ekwb.com/blog/radiators-part-3-surface-thickness/ […]

  10. recurve bow says:

    … [Trackback]

    […] Read More on to that Topic: ekwb.com/blog/radiators-part-3-surface-thickness/ […]

  11. … [Trackback]

    […] Find More Information here on that Topic: ekwb.com/blog/radiators-part-3-surface-thickness/ […]

  12. … [Trackback]

    […] Read More to that Topic: ekwb.com/blog/radiators-part-3-surface-thickness/ […]

  13. aksara178 says:

    … [Trackback]

    […] Here you can find 19080 more Information to that Topic: ekwb.com/blog/radiators-part-3-surface-thickness/ […]

  14. … [Trackback]

    […] Find More on that Topic: ekwb.com/blog/radiators-part-3-surface-thickness/ […]

  15. … [Trackback]

    […] Information to that Topic: ekwb.com/blog/radiators-part-3-surface-thickness/ […]

  16. … [Trackback]

    […] Information to that Topic: ekwb.com/blog/radiators-part-3-surface-thickness/ […]

  17. … [Trackback]

    […] Information on that Topic: ekwb.com/blog/radiators-part-3-surface-thickness/ […]

  18. […] fans to allow air to flow freely. Static pressure fans are required to allow for ideal airflow in thick radiators. The cost of two of these fans is not much greater than half the cost of your radiator. Choosing a […]

  19. […] for the liquid cooling, you can place 360mm cooling radiators on the rear and […]

  20. […] if you want to build a super gaming case, don’t worry; you can add more components like fans and radiators in its triple-chamber […]

Comments are closed.